Monthly Archive for December, 2009

Page 2 of 6

Rhode Island’s Plight Before Christmas

’Twas the week before Christmas, when all through the state
People’s financial standing was not all too great
With the unemployment at 13 percent,
Folks barely had funds for food and for rent.
With children longing for Christmas ahead,
They have no idea of our state’s fiscal dread.
And, mothers and fathers trying to make the season merry
Had personal finances exceptionally weary.
Meanwhile at Smith Hill, there arose but a whimper
With no action done, making state hardships simpler
The hands were quite tied of the head elf Carcieri
Making all of his actions unproductively leery.
And, with the entrenched ilk in the legislature
They certainly weren’t seeking the state’s fiscal cure;
Run by a one-party monopoly no doubt
Gives credence to why results aren’t about.
The majority members just raise campaign funds
And, roll out a hopeless agenda that stuns
Even with a budget $220 million in the hole
Here is the agenda they push on us all:
More taxes! More spending! No job creation!
No E-Verify, no small-biz incentives, no revenue generation.
From the top of the Statehouse to the homes on our street
Our elected officials have made opportunity retreat.
But, with many weeks and months in the session gone by
This year, we’ve heard a populist battle-cry
With the Rhode Island Tea Party now formed
The policies of status quo have now been stormed.
With such economic displacement, our leaders aloof
This movement’s perspective has blown apathy’s roof
Made up of all ideologies, demos and classes
It has rung through the year like a voice for the masses.
Holding high the proud mantra of “Don’t Tread On Me”
They’ve held protests and rallies for the whole state to see
They’ve demonstrated through our First amendment right
The problems we face and deal with in plain sight.
As unemployment numbers continue to rise
Great stress of this hardship continues to strive
So says a New York Times poll out today
Gives a better idea of this sparse holiday.
With 86 percent of the unemployed “in crisis”
It shows no big-government policy has done much to advise us
As a result to make finances meet
The poll shows what sacrifices families must treat.
With 93 percent making cutbacks to spending
That means fewer Christmas gifts loved ones are sending
And, 77 percent have cut back on vacations
Meaning less holiday gatherings with family relations.
But, the worst economic poll result that came out?
Shows 60 percent have taken money from their savings account;
This goes far beyond Scrooge or Grinch,
It shows the hardship of an economic pinch.
But, as Christmas counts down and the baby New Year is born
Rhode Island can make our state economy less torn;
Take a page from R.I. Tea Party’s book
That gives the government of our founders a second look.
We don’t have to settle for what we live now,
But, strong policy changes we must allow;
So, I strongly exclaim as my words disappear
Vote do-nothing incumbents out of office next year!

Submitted by William Sousa Grapentine

Share

Senate Democrats: You Can Buy Them By The Bagful



Cartoon Source: William Warren

Share

Ronald Reagan’s Christmas Address 12/23/1981

In a world of political correctness and Christmas culture wars, Reagan’s national address is almost unbelievable! It is a breath of fresh Christmas air! What happened to the politicians like him who are not afraid to hold fast to the Christian faith despite what others think or say about their Christmas beliefs? God help us by sending more like him back into our country (and soon)!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU0tuah-x7M[/youtube]

Share

Congratulations, Liberals… President Obama Lied To You, Too.

Here is video called “Obama Promised” produced by a liberal group called “Yes We Still Can,” which hammers President Obama for going back on his word to insist that a “Public Option” be in the Democrats’ Health Care Bill. Those on the Left are not pleased with the Senate bill which omits a so-called “Public Option.” One can only hope that their pressure during the bill reconciliation process between the House and Senate can keep the bill from becoming law.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acc6Wn_BWlk[/youtube]

Share

Sarah Palin: ‘Told Ya So!’

No one is certain of what’s in the bill, but Senator Jim DeMint spotted one shocking revelation regarding the section in the bill describing the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (now called the Independent Payment Advisory Board), which is a panel of bureaucrats charged with cutting health care costs on the backs of patients – also known as rationing. Apparently Reid and friends have changed the rules of the Senate so that the section of the bill dealing with this board can’t be repealed or amended without a 2/3 supermajority vote. Senator DeMint said:

“This is a rule change. It’s a pretty big deal. We will be passing a new law and at the same time creating a senate rule that makes it out of order to amend or even repeal the law. I’m not even sure that it’s constitutional, but if it is, it most certainly is a senate rule. I don’t see why the majority party wouldn’t put this in every bill. If you like your law, you most certainly would want it to have force for future senates. I mean, we want to bind future congresses. This goes to the fundamental purpose of senate rules: to prevent a tyrannical majority from trampling the rights of the minority or of future congresses.”

In other words, Democrats are protecting this rationing “death panel” from future change with a procedural hurdle. You have to ask why they’re so concerned about protecting this particular provision. Could it be because bureaucratic rationing is one important way Democrats want to “bend the cost curve” and keep health care spending down?

The Congressional Budget Office seems to think that such rationing has something to do with cost. In a letter to Harry Reid last week, CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf noted (with a number of caveats) that the bill’s calculations call for a reduction in Medicare’s spending rate by about 2 percent in the next two decades, but then he writes the kicker:

“It is unclear whether such a reduction in the growth rate could be achieved, and if so, whether it would be accomplished through greater efficiencies in the delivery of health care or would reduce access to care or diminish the quality of care.”

Though Nancy Pelosi and friends have tried to call “death panels” the “lie of the year,” this type of rationing – what the CBO calls “reduc[ed] access to care” and “diminish[ed] quality of care” – is precisely what I meant when I used that metaphor.

Source: Sarah Palin on Facebook

Share

Not-So-Secret Santa: Senator Reids Payoffs, Kickbacks, and Sweetheart Deals

All year long, the more the American people learn about Washington Democrats’ costly government takeover of health care, the more they oppose it. Indeed a new Quinnipiac survey shows continued disapproval for the Democrats’ government-run approach. Only 36 percent support Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-NV) bill, while a majority (53 percent) oppose. Opposition among Independents, at 58 percent, is even higher. And that anger is growing as Americans find out more about Sen. Reid’s unseemly payoffs, kickbacks, and sweetheart deals that were included to buy the votes of Democratic senators. Here’s a sampling of the reaction to these payoffs, kickbacks, and sweetheart deals in today’s papers:

“If it could be proved that the chief executive officer of a major American corporation — a pharmaceutical firm, say, or an insurance outfit — had delivered hundreds of millions of dollars to the governors of two of the 50 states in exchange for two U.S. senators from those states changing their votes and defeating the proposed federal takeover of America’s medical industry, it’s not too hard to imagine the results: the perpetrator led out of his office in handcuffs by the FBI, front-page indictments and trials, commentators reviling the worst case of public corruption to be seen at such a high level in generations. Yet when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., promised to deliver those sums to Nebraska and Louisiana (and not to the other 48, no credible claim of ‘the general welfare’ here) in recent weeks to buy off Sens. Mary Landrieu and Ben Nelson in order to line up the 59th and 60th votes needed to pass the biggest new federal boondoggle in half a century — the Nebraska payoff coming early Saturday morning — he didn’t even try to keep it a secret.” – “Health Care Deal Looks A Lot Like a Bribe,” Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial, December 23, 2009

“Blanche Lincoln and Evan Bayh must feel like saps. The Arkansas and Indiana Democrats spent months caterwauling about this or that provision in the Senate health-care bill, then at 1 a.m. Monday they voted to speed its passage without getting so much as a lousy T-shirt. In Harry Reid’s Senate, this qualifies as dereliction of duty, as the Majority Leader said himself on Monday in defense of his frantic deal-making to get 60 votes.” – “The Price of ‘History,’” Wall Street Journal editorial, December 23, 2009

“In the wee hours of Monday morning, Senate Democrats passed their version of health reform in a strictly partisan 60-40 procedural vote. It was accomplished with political payoffs that should die in conference committee but probably won’t. The tawdry use of earmarks to bury the doubts of recalcitrant moderate Democrats was a cynical display of ends-justifies-the-means horse-trading that President Barack Obama campaigned against as a senator and candidate.” – “Harry Reid Sells His Political Soul,” Fort Worth Star-Telegram editorial, December 23, 2009

“Among the most distasteful elements were essentially the payoffs used to secure votes from senators in Nebraska, Florida, and Louisiana. The shakedowns, er, side deals provide extra funding for Medicaid and Medicare just in these states, and limits on abortion coverage demanded by Sen. Ben Nelson (D., Neb.)” – “A Health Deal is at Hand,” Philadelphia Inquirer editorial, December 23, 2009

“New Yorkers better be ready to dig deeper into their pockets to pay off all the bribes Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., offered senators of other states to win their support for the $871 billion health reform bill.” – “Reid Payoffs,” Watertown Daily Times editorial, December 23, 2009

“America’s overused credit card, issued by the Bank of China, may have to be used one more time to pay for Reid’s deals. The majority leader traded to help ensure the votes of Sens. Ben Nelson, Mary Landrieu, Chris Dodd, Bernie Sanders and others representing 11 states by giving them special perks for staying on the health care bus that’s about to drive us all over the financial cliff. They may argue they weren’t bribed, but they certainly were rewarded. The price was enormous.” – “Harry Reid Playing Santa With Your Money,” CNN column, December 23, 2009

“With the approval rating of Congress sinking in the polls and public opinion of their health care plan going down along with it, Democrats may have done themselves one favor too many this week when they riddled the bill with special deals for individual lawmakers. As Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., struggled to pull together his 60 Democratic-controlled votes needed to pass the bill, certain holdout lawmakers were able to carve out extra money, benefits or exemptions that senators from other states didn’t get.” – “Big Payoffs to Senators on Health Bill Stokes Public Anger,” Washington Examiner, December 23, 2009

“Sometimes there is a fine ethical line between legislative maneuvering and bribery. At other times, that line is crossed by a speeding, honking tractor-trailer, with outlines of shapely women on mud flaps bouncing as it rumbles past. Such was the case in the final hours of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s successful attempt to get cloture on health-care reform. Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, the last Democratic holdout, was offered and accepted a permanent exemption from his state’s share of Medicaid expansion, amounting to $100 million over 10 years.” – “For Sale: One Senator (D-Neb.) No Principles, Low Price,” Washington Post column, December 23, 2009

Republicans are standing up for American taxpayers by exposing these payoffs, kickbacks, and sweetheart deals and offering better solutions to lower health care costs. The Republican health care plan would lower premiums by up to 10 percent, cut the deficit, and consistently reduce federal spending on health care over the next two decades. That’s the type of common-sense solutions the American people want and deserve out of health care reform.


Source: House Republican Leader John Boehner

Share

Just In Time for Christmas … We’re Ba-ack!

You may have noticed that we have not made any updates to the website for nearly a week now. We had been experiencing a serious technical problem having to do with a script error, which caused a temporary inability for us to comment and edit our posts. It appears to have finally been resolved!

Share

What do Radical Environmentalists and Watermelons Have In Common?

watermelon2Green on the outside… Red on the inside.

Here’s what you probably did not see reported about the U.N. climate change conference on the evening news… thousands of flag-waving Communists and Socialists marching in the streets of Copenhagen, Denmark, in support of radical action to stop [what they consider to be human-caused] Global Warming. Many held banners attacking “Capitalism,” and chanting slogans like “Long Live Socialism.” Many communist flags are visible featuring the “hammer and sickle.” . Totally mainstream folks, right?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNQqUACJ_Kw[/youtube]

Source: Americans for Prosperity

Share

RIGOP Notes that AG Patrick Lynch’s Approval Ratings Are In The Dump

landfillThe Rhode Island Republican Party took note of a poll released yesterday by Brown University, with Party Chair Giovanni Cicione commenting that “it should send a clear signal to Attorney General Patrick Lynch that the voters of Rhode Island are starting to see the truth about him and his cronies and that they don’t like what they see.”

In May 2009, Attorney General Lynch had a job approval rating of 47% (the combined excellent and good percentage) and a negative rating of 39% (the combined fair and poor percentages) or a net positive rating of 8%. Now, a little over six months later, Mr. Lynch has a job approval rating of 38% and a negative rating of 47% or a net negative rating of 9%. This flip is a huge swing of 17% over a seven month period. Nearly one in five voters has changed their minds about Lynch.

Although some of Rhode Island federal elected officials saw their approval ratings decline, none matched Mr. Lynch. It is telling that none of the other elected officials to statewide office saw such a dramatic change over the same period. For example, Lt. Governor Roberts went from 22% approval rating and 36% disapproval rating in May to 22% approval rating and 37% disapproval rating in December. Governor Carcieri went from a 36% approval rating and 59% disapproval rating in May to 37% approval rating and 56% disapproval rating in December. General Treasurer Caprio only saw a slight decline. He went from a 41% approval rating and 24% disapproval rating in May to a 39% approval and 26% disapproval rating in December.

“Clearly Mr. Lynch’s approval rating is in the dump”, said Cicione, “because of the revelations and negative publicity regarding Lynch’s out of state travels, the related complaints filed by the RIGOP against Mr. Lynch at the Board of Elections and Ethics Commission relating to those trips, and the total inaction by the Mr. Lynch in stopping corruption at Rhode Island’s dump, the Johnston Landfill.” “If Mr. Lynch seriously expects the voters to consider him as a credible candidate for Governor, he will need to take a break from the junkets and fundraising tours and instead stay in Rhode Island to start addressing the waste and corruption perpetrated by political insiders.”

Press Release: Rhode Island Republican Party

Share

Update: Republican General Assembly Candidate Tom Clupny

ThomasClupnyTom Clupny, our Republican Candidate who is running for House of Representatives in the District 62 (Pawtucket/East Providence) Special Election, will be making a guest appearance on two television talk shows this week.

Tonight at 8:00 PM he will be on the “Tax Payers Talk Back”. The program airs on Cox channel 18 and will run at various times until December 28th.

On Saturday, December 19th he will be on “Portuguese in Rhode Island” airing on Saturday at 4:00pm and on Sunday at 6:00pm on Cox channel 15 and Verizon channel 30.

Tom needs your support today! He is running in a very Democratic area and any monetary or physical support will be greatly appreciated. For more information about Tom please visit his website at http://www.tomclupny.com or contact his campaign manager (Joe Giammarco) at Ltuta1 [at] aol [dot] com.

He will be doing more lit dropping over the next few weekends leading up to the special election taking place on December 29th. Again, we all know the holidays are here and our time is limited, but what better stocking stuffer for the party and our candidate than donating at least an hour of your time helping Tom win a seat in the General Assembly!

Donations can be sent to:

Thomas L Clupny for District 62 General Assembly
30 Bourne Avenue
Rumford, RI 02916

Source: Rhode Island Republican Party

Share