Thank you to all the individuals and grassroots groups who actively opposed the corrupt binding arbitration legislation for public school teachers, which would have pushed many municipalities in Rhode Island over the edge and many more people out of our state. Although the bill just barely passed through the Rhode Island Senate (20-17), Speaker Fox has indicated that it will not taken up by the Rhode Island House this session.
We want to encourage you to remember the 20 Senators who voted against your city, your right to elected representation, and of course, your wallet. If you live in their district, please consider running against them or helping those who will be.
The 20 have a “Y” between to their last name and district number and are highlighted in red below:
CALENDAR
ITEM 30 2011S 794 SUB A
McCAFFREY LABOR
School Teachers’ Arbitration
PASSAGE
YEAS – 20 NAYS – 17 NOT VOTING – 1
SENATOR VOTE DISTRICT CITY/TOWN
ALGIERE N
BATES N
CICCONE Y 7 PROVIDENCE/NORTH PROVIDENCE
COTE N
CROWLEY N
DaPONTE Y 14 EAST PROVIDENCE/PAWTUCKET
DeVALL Y 18 EAST PROVIDENCE
DiPALMA Y 12 LITTLE COMPTON/MIDDLETOWN/NEWPORT/TIVERTON
DOYLE Y 8 PAWTUCKET
FELAG N
FOGARTY N
GALLO Y 27 CRANSTON
GOODWIN Y 1 PROVIDENCE
HODGSON N
JABOUR Y 5 PROVIDENCE
KETTLE N
LANZI Y 26 CRANSTON
LOMBARDO N
LYNCH Y 31 WARWICK
MAHER N
McCAFFREY Y 29 WARWICK
METTS Y 6 PROVIDENCE
MILLER Y 28 CRANSTON/WARWICK
MOURA N
NESSELBUSH N
O’NEILL, E. N
OTTIANO N
PERRY Y 3 PROVIDENCE
PICARD N
PICHARDO Y 2 PROVIDENCE
PINGA N
RUGGERIO Y 4 PROVIDENCE/NORTH PROVIDENCE
SHEEHAN Y 36 NARRAGANSETT/NORTH KINGSTOWN
SHIBLEY N
SOSNOWSKI Y 37 NEW SHOREHAM/SOUTH KINGSTOWN
TASSONI NV 22 SMITHFIELD/NORTH SMITHFIELD
WALASKA Y 30 WARWICK
PAIVA WEED Y 13 NEWPORT/JAMESTOWN









Posts
I’ll match my facts against Sen. Tassoni anytime, anywhere.
In the 7/21/2011 Observer (http://breezepapers.com/2011/07/20/observer/tassoni-says-gop-boss-hirons-should-get-his-facts-straight) the senator takes some liberties with the truth concerning statements made earlier by John Dionne and myself. Below is my response to the Observer.
Sen.Tassoni says Mr Dionne and I need to get our facts straight. I am up for that challenge.
Mr Dionne said the senator’s sponsorship and support of Binding Arbitration was based on his past relationship with labor unions. The senator’s answer was that he’s no longer employed by a union. Correct. But that does not change the fact that he was in the past as Mr Dionne stated. Not to mention his newspaper’s (http://www.commongroundnews.net) advertisements are at least half for unions, affiliated organizations or businesses owned by fellow democrat politicians. While the senator is no longer a public union employee, he is clearly in good standing with the public sector union political action committees. In the 2nd quarter of this non-election year he received over $2500 in public sector PAC donations. (http://www.ricampaignfinance.com/RIPublic/Filings.aspx)
Moving on to the Binding Arbitration Bill (S0794 http://www.rilin.state.ri.us//BillText11/SenateText11/S0794A.pdf )and the Senate votes on it on June 29th. (The Senate Journal http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/journals11/senatejournals11/SJournal6-28.pdf). Sen.Tassoni sponsored the bill. If it is a conflict to vote for a bill, how can it not be to sponsor it?
There were 7 votes related to the bill. 5 amendments, a motion to move the final vote to June 30th and the actual vote on the bill. Sen.Tassoni recorded no vote on the first 6 votes and finally abstained on the 7th. Final total 6 walks, 1 abstention.
Is binding arbitration bad for Smithfield and North Smithfield? I am not an expert so I’ll defer to the elected municipal officials. Of the 21 elected municipal officials (Smithfield 5 council, 5 school committee; N. Smithfield 5 council, 5 school committee, 1 administrator), 15 are listed in opposition at the RI Coalition Against Binding Arbitration website (www.ricaba.org). The rest have not answered, yet. The opposed includes the 3 members of the democratic majority on the Smithfield School Committee.
Clearly the municipal officials in the 22nd senate district think this idea is a bad one. From the national media it appears states are not enacting this idea right now. Most are running away from it.
Yes, sometimes our General Assembly members should recuse themselves. Sen.Tassoni has sponsored hundreds of bills in his time in the RI Senate. He generally makes the top 5 in the number of senate bill filled every year. Researching how many time he has recused himself since his election is not an easy task. However, I would bet the number can be counted on 2 hands.
Recusing oneself from an issue should include not submitting bills on the subject, not voting on the subject and not advocating for the subject. About a third of the senator’s letter was singing the praises of the binding arbitration bill he submitted. Score 1 out of 3 on recusing.
Phil Hirons, Jr.
Chair, Smithfield Republican Town Committee
Vice President, RIRA